The authoritarian parenting style is about being opens in a new windowstrict and stern. It insists on unquestioning obedience, and enforces good behavior through psychological control — threats, shaming, and other punishments. As defined by psychologists, it’s also a style associated with relatively little parental warmth and responsiveness (Baumrind 1991).

silhouette and shadow of a child being confronted by an ominous person

That doesn’t bode well for children’s health outcomes, especially in stressful environments. As I note opens in a new windowelsewhere, warmth and responsiveness can protect kids from the effects of toxic stress.

But what about other outcomes? Are the children of authoritarian parents well-adjusted? Do they get along with others? Do they excel in school? If authoritarian parents are demanding, shouldn’t their children be better-behaved and more successful in the classroom?

It sounds plausible, but of course we need some context. Better-behaved and more successful compared with what? Typically, researchers compare authoritarian parenting with two other styles:

Note that “authoritative” parenting goes by a label that sounds deceptively similar to “authoritarian”. But the contrast is stark, and it isn’t only because authoritative parents show more warmth. Unlike authoritarian parents, authoriative parents encourage their children to ask questions, and they explain the rationale behind the rules. In addition, authoritative parents avoid controlling their kids through the induction of shame, guilt, or the withdrawal of love.

So — with these alternatives in mind — how does authoritarianism measure up?

Evidence that authoritarian parenting makes behavior problems worse

When kids have really difficult behavior problems, it might seem that the only remedy is severe disciple — to control children through threats, harsh punishments, or shaming. But research suggests these tactics don’t result in long-term behavioral improvements. On the contrary, they seem to make things worse.

For instance, let’s consider what psychologists call “externalizing problems” — disruptive, aggressive, defiant, or anti-social behavior. If authoritarian disciplinary tactics were effective, we would expect them to lead to fewer such behavior problems as children get older.

But that isn’t what we observe when we track children’s development. In a meta-analysis of more than 1400 published studies, Martin Pinquart found that harsh discipline and psychological control were actually the biggest predictors of a child’d behavior worsening over time (Pinquart 2017). Kids subjected to authoritarian tactics at one time point tended to develop more externalizing behavior problems at later time points.

Why? We can’t assume it’s entirely due to authoritarian parenting. Maybe genetic factors are partly to blame. After all, we know that genetic factors can raise a child’s risk of developing certain kinds of behavior problems, and such kids may tend to provoke authoritarian responses from their caregivers. Parents see their children misbehaving, and they struggle to find a solution. They feel stressed and frustrated. They crack down with harsh discipline — threats and punishments — and show less warmth toward their misbehaving children.

It’s a scenario where behavior problems and authoritarian parenting are linked, but not necessarily because authoritarian parenting causes behavior problems. Instead, the kids themselves are part of the story. Their misbehavior triggers authoritarian responses.

So how do we find out what’s really going on? When researchers have tried to tease apart causation, they’ve confirmed that children’s pre-existing behavior problems can indeed provoke authoritarian reactions from parents. But there is also evidence that authoritarianism is harmful. It appears to make children’s behavior problems worse.

For example, in a behavioral genetics study of twins, Rebecca Waller and her colleagues focused on kids with “callous unemotional traits” — traits that like low empathy and poor moral self-regulation (Waller et al 2018).

These traits are linked with serious behavior problems, and Waller’s team confirmed that genes matter. Some kids were at higher genetic risk for developing “callous unemotional traits.” But parenting style also had an effect. When parents showed children lots of warmth and affection, kids were less likely to develop callous unemotional traits. Even kids who were at high genetic risk showed fewer symptoms.

What about the development of social skills? Does authoritarianism help or hurt?

It’s hard to know if authoritarian parenting causes children to develop differently. But when researchers compare different parenting styles, they’ve found that authoritarian parenting is linked with lower social competence (Steinberg et al 1994; Chen et al 1997; Zhou et al 2004; Martinez et al 2007; Garcia and Gracia 2009; Garcia et al 2020).

For example, in a study of more than 2500 adults and adolescents living in Spain, folks who identified their parents as authoritarian tended to score lower on empathy (Martinez-Escudero et al 2020).

In Turkey, high school students from authoritarian families were rated as less resourceful than kids from authoritarian or permissive parents (Turkel and Tzer 2008).

And in the Netherlands, kids with authoritarian parents were rated as less helpful and less popular by their teachers and classmates. They were also rated as less mature in their reasoning about moral issues (Dekovic and Jannsens 1992; Jannsens and Dekovic 1997). In addition, there is evidence that American teenagers feel lower levels of social acceptance from their peers when they are raised by authoritarian parents (Lamborn et al 1991; Steinberg et al 1992; Steinberg et al 1994).

Is there any connection between authoritarian parenting and bullying?

Yes. Numerous studies — conducted in a variety of cultural settings — suggest that kids are at higher risk for involvement in bullying if their parents use authoritarian tactics or attempt to control them through the use of punitive discipline (Georgiou et al 2013; Luk et al 2016; Krisana et al 2019; Martínez-Ferrer  et al 2019; Zurcher et al 2018; Gómez-Ortiz et al 2016).

Does authoritarianism put kids at greater risk of emotional problems? It might.

In places as diverse as Germany, the Caribbean, China, Taiwan, and the United States, researchers have noticed links between authoritarian parenting and emotional troubles — including childhood anxiety, symptoms of depression, and poor self-regulation (Azman et al 2012; Wolfradt et al 2003; King et al 2016; Lipps et al 2012; Chang 2003; Wang et al 2006; Gan et al 2021; Huang et al 2019; Gan et al 2021).

Moreover, researchers in Latin cultures have recorded lower levels of self-esteem among adolescents from authoritarian homes (Martinez et al 2020; Queiroz et al 2020), and the effects may linger into adulthhood: Spanish adults report less happiness and life satisfaction if they were raised by strict, authoritarian parents (Garcia et al 2020).

Is this simply a case of shared genetics? Maybe authoritarian parents tend to be at higher genetic risk for developing emotional problems, and their kids inherit those same genes. But there’s evidence against this as the primary explanation.

For example, in a behavioral genetics study of Chinese twins, researchers found that kids with authoritarian fathers were more likely to suffer from a psychiatric disorder — even after accounting for the influence of genes (Yin et al 2016). Similarly, a behavioral genetics study conducted in the United States suggests that authoritarian parenting puts kids at higher risk for experiencing major depression during adulthood (Long et al 2015).

And in a meta-analysis of 31 studies on the development of foster children, researchers found that kids were more likely to end up with emotional problems if their foster parents took an authoritarian approach to discipline (Chodura et al 2021).

Yet it’s worth noting: The authoritarian parenting style isn’t always linked with emotional problems.

Some studies of American adolescents have failed to find emotional differences between kids from authoritarian, authoritative, and permissive homes (Lamborn et al 1991; Steinberg et al 2006). And research on adolescents in the Middle East has also failed to find a link between authoritarian care-giving and psychological problems like depression (Dwairy 2004; Dwairy and Menshar 2006).

Why the inconsistencies? I suspect the effects of authoritarianism depend on how harsh, cold, or punitive the parent is. For instance, as I noted in my article about spanking, research suggests that corporal punishment is linked with higher rates of depression and anxiety among children. Maybe some forms of authoritarian parenting are more intense — more negatively impactful — than others.

It also seems likely that culture plays a role. If kids perceive authoritarianism as normal and mainstream, they may be less distressed by it (Dwairy 2004). Consistent with this idea, in societies where it’s normative for parents to exert lots of psychological control, links between parental control and poor emotional outcomes are weaker (Lansford et al 2018).

How do children from authoritarian homes perform academically?

Several lines of evidence suggest that authoritarianism puts children at an academic disadvantage. For example, experimental research suggests that authoritarian approaches interfere with learning.

In a fascinating study of kindergartners, Melissa Kamins and Carol Dweck have shown that a common tactic of authoritarian care-giving — shaming a child for poor performance — opens in a new windowcan make kids perform more poorly on problem-solving tasks (Kamins and Dweck 1999). Moreover, experiments suggest that people learn better from positive feedback than from negative feedback, and this may be especially true for kids (Schmittmann et al 2006; van Duijvenvoorde et al 2008).

There is also evidence that authoritarian parents are less helpful in teaching their children to think critically.

In a recent study of nearly 150 American parents, Candace Mills and colleagues found that parents who endorsed authoritarian values responded differently to a child’s difficult science questions (Mills et al 2022). These parents were less likely to confess their own uncertainty, even though they were more likely to provide answers that were incorrect. They were also less likely to model an approach for coping with uncertainty (like: “Hey, let’s see if we can find the answer online…”).

Finally, researchers have detected correlations between authoritarianism and lower school achievement.

For instance, several studies conducted in the United States have found that the authoritarian parenting style was linked with lower school grades for all ethnic groups (Dornbusch et al 1987; Steinberg et al 1989; Steinberg et al 1992), though it appears that the effects may be less negative for Hispanic children than for white, non-Hispanic children (Pinkart and Kauser 2018).

And in both Germany and China, children tend to experience worse academic outcomes when their parents impose high levels of psychological control (Teuber et al 2021; Li and Hein 2019; Wang et al 2012; Xu et al 2019).

Counter evidence: Do children ever benefit from authoritarian parenting?

When researchers have reviewed more than 425 studies conducted worldwide, they found that “authoritarian parenting was associated with at least 1 negative outcome in all regions of the globe” (Pinquart and Kauser 2018). But we should keep in mind: The effects vary in their intensity, and, as noted above, not all research has been negative.

For example, we’ve mentioned cultural settings where authoritarian parenting doesn’t seem to raise a child’s risk for emotional problems. In addition, some studies have failed to demonstrate a negative effect on academic achievement for families of lower economic status (Lamborn et al 1996; Steinberg et al 2009), and, in at least one case, investigators have argued that these kids may actually do better in school when they come from authoritarian homes (Leung et al 1988).

Moreover, there has been some controversy about the effects of authoritarian parenting in traditional Chinese families. On the one hand, authoritarianism has been linked with poorer school performance in Beijing (e.g., Chen et al 1997) and Taiwan (e.g., Pong et al 2010). On the other hand, some studies of Hong Kong Chinese (Leung et al 1998) and of Chinese immigrants to North America (Chao 2001) have linked authoritarian parenting with higher school achievement.

Why the discrepancies? Researchers have suggested several possibilities.

  • Perhaps kids living in dangerous, disadvantaged neighborhoods are less likely to run afoul of authority figures—in and out of school—when they are taught unquestioning obedience.
  • Maybe peer pressure swamps the effects of parenting. Some peer groups support school achievement. Others discourage it. In one study of U.S. students, researchers found that the Asian Americans in the sample tended to have peer groups that encouraged scholarship, and they performed well at school even when their parents were authoritarian. By contrast, the African Americans in the sample tended to have peer groups that rejected high achievers. These kids did more poorly in school even when their parents were authoritative and highly-educated (Steinberg et al 1992).
  • Authoritarian parenting may have different meanings in different cultures. Ruth Chao has argued that the Chinese version of authoritarian parenting is fundamentally different. Unlike Western authoritarian parents, Chinese authoritarian parents have closer relationships to their kids, and closeness is a predictor of higher school achievement (Chao 2001).

But — personally — I’m skeptical about the idea that authoritarian parenting could make some kids into better scholars. The experimental research is compelling. Moreover, achievement in math, science, and many other academic fields depends on critical thinking—something that authoritarian parenting seems to discourage.

Indeed, there is evidence that schools run along authoritarian principles produce inferior students. In a study comparing American high schools, Lisa Pellerin found that authoritative schools got the best results. Authoritarian schools had the worst rates of dropouts (Pellerin 2004).

How does authoritarian parenting influence the development of a child’s moral sense?

Authoritarian parents might see themselves as champions of morality. But, as noted above, studies suggest that kids with authoritarian parents are actually less advanced when it comes to self-regulation and moral reasoning (Dekovic and Jannsens 1992; Jannsens and Dekovic 1997; Karreman et al 2006; Piotrowski et al 2013).

Moreover, kids from authoritarian families may be more likely to “tune out” their parents as they get older. For instance, when researchers tracked American middle and high school studies over 18 months, they found that kids who identified their parents as more authoritarian were more likely to reject their parents as legitimate authority figures. They were also more likely to engage in delinquency over time (Trinker et al 2012).

And in a study of American undergraduates, researchers asked students who they consulted when they had to make moral decisions. Undergraduates with authoritative parents were the most likely to say they would talk with their parents. Students with authoritarian parents — like students from permissive families — were more likely to reference their peers (Bednar et al 2003).

More information

For more information about the four basic parenting styles, check out  opens in a new window“Parenting styles: A guide for the science-minded.” For a more information about the ways that researchers define and identify authoritarian parents, see  opens in a new window“The authoritarian parenting style: Definitions, research, and cultural differences.”

Wondering about how physical punishment affects children? See my articles, “Spanking children: Why does it happen, and what are the effects?” and “Evidence that spanking alters the brain”.

And you might be interested in my article about the need for kids to express their autonomy. It discusses evidence that our kids will tune out — and see us as illegitimate authority figures — if we become overly intrusive or bossy.

References: Authoritarian parenting outcomes

Azman Ö, Mauz E, Reitzle M, Geene R, Hölling H, Rattay P. 2021. Adolescents Aged 11-17 Years: Results of the KiGGS Cohort Study (Second Follow-Up). Children (Basel). 8(8):672.

Chodura S, Lohaus A, Symanzik T, Heinrichs N, Konrad K. 2021. Foster Parents’ Parenting and the Social-Emotional Development and Adaptive Functioning of Children in Foster Care: A PRISMA-Guided Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 24(2):326-347.

Bednar DE and Fisher TD. 2003. Peer referencing in adolescent decision making as a function of perceived parenting style. Adolescence. 38(152):607-21.

Calafat A, García F, Juan M, Becoña E, Fernández-Hermida JR. 2014. Which parenting style is more protective against adolescent substance use? Evidence within the European context. Drug Alcohol Depend. 138:185-92.

Calzada E, Barajas-Gonzalez RG, Huang KY, Brotman L. 2015. Early Childhood Internalizing Problems in Mexican- and Dominican-Origin Children: The Role of Cultural Socialization and Parenting Practices. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 4:1-12.

Chang L, Schwartz D, Dodge K, McBride-Chang C. 2003. Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression. Journal of Family Psychology. 17:598–606.

Chao R. 2001. Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development 72: 1832-1843.

Chao R. 1994. Beyond parental control; authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development 45: 1111-1119.

Chen X, Dong Q, Zhou H. 1997 Authoritative and Authoritarian Parenting Practices and Social and School Performance in Chinese Children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(4): 855-873

Chodura S, Lohaus A, Symanzik T, Heinrichs N, Konrad K. 2021. Foster Parents’ Parenting and the Social-Emotional Development and Adaptive Functioning of Children in Foster Care: A PRISMA-Guided Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 24(2):326-347.

Crone EA, Ridderinkhof KR, Worm M, Somsen RJ, van der Molen MW (2004) Switching between spatial stimulus-response mappings: a developmental study of cognitive flexibility. Dev Sci 7:443–455.

Dekovic M and Janssens JM. 1992. Parents’ child: Rearing style and child’s sociometric status.” Developmental Psychology 28(5): 925-932.

Dornbusch SM, Ritter PL, Leiderman PH, Roberts DF, Fraleigh MJ. 1987. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Dev. 58(5):1244-57.

Dwairy M and Menshar KE. 2006. Parenting style, individuation, and mental health of Egyptian adolescents. J Adolesc. 29(1):103-17.

Dwairy M. 2004. Parenting styles and mental health of Palestinian-Arab adolescents in Israel. Transcult Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;41(2):233-52.

Day DM, Peterson-Badali M, and Ruck MD. 2006. The relationship between maternal attitudes and young people’s attitudes toward children’s rights. J Adolesc. 29(2):193-207.

Gan X, Li H, Li M, Yu C, Jin X, Zhu C, Liu Y. 2021. Parenting Styles, Depressive Symptoms, and Problematic Online Game Use in Adolescents: A Developmental Cascades Model. Front Public Health. 9:710667.

Guo Y, Zhang YQ, Wu CA, Yin XN, Zhang JY, Wu JB, Jing J, Jin Y, Lin L, Chen WQ. 2021. Bidirectional associations between parenting styles and conduct problems in Chinese preschool children: the Shenzhen Longhua Child Cohort Study. Psychol Health Med. 1-14.

Garcia OF, Fuentes MC, Gracia E, Serra E, Garcia F. 2020. Parenting Warmth and Strictness across Three Generations: Parenting Styles and Psychosocial Adjustment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(20):7487.

Georgiou SN, Fousiani K, Michaelides M, and Stavrinides P. 2013. Cultural value orientation and authoritarian parenting as parameters of bullying and victimization at school. Int J Psychol. 48(1):69-78.

Ginsburg KR, Durbin DR, García-España JF, Kalicka EA, and Winston FK. 2009. Associations between parenting styles and teen driving, safety-related behaviors and attitudes. Pediatrics. 124(4):1040-51.

Glozah FN. 2014. Exploring the Role of Self-Esteem and Parenting Patterns on Alcohol Use and Abuse Among Adolescents. Health Psychol Res. 2(3):1898.

Gómez-Ortiz O, Romera EM, Ortega-Ruiz R. 2016. Parenting styles and bullying. The mediating role of parental psychological aggression and physical punishment. Child Abuse Negl. 51:132-43.

Hampshire C, Mahoney B, Davis SK. 2022. Parenting Styles and Disordered Eating Among Youths: A Rapid Scoping Review. Front Psychol. 12:802567

Huang CY, Hsieh YP, Shen AC, Wei HS, Feng JY, Hwa HL, Feng JY.2019. Relationships between Parent-Reported Parenting, Child-Perceived Parenting, and Children’s Mental Health in Taiwanese Children.  Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(6):1049.

Janssens JMAM and Dekovic M. 1997. Child Rearing, Prosocial Moral Reasoning, and Prosocial Behaviour. International Journal of Behavioral Development 20(3): 509-527.

Kamins M and Dweck C.1999. Person versus process praise and criticism:Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology 30(3): 835-847.

Karreman A, van Tuijl C, can Aken MAG, and Dekovic M. 2006. Parenting and self-regulation in preschoolers: a meta-analysis. Infant and Child Dev. 15: 562-579.

Kim H, Chung RH. 2003 Relationship of recalled parenting style to self-perception in Korean American college students. J Genet Psychol. 164(4):481-92.

King KA, Vidourek RA, Merianos AL. 2016. Authoritarian parenting and youth depression: Results from a national study. J Prev Interv Community. 44(2):130-9.

Lansford JE, Godwin J, Al-Hassan SM, Bacchini D, Bornstein MH, Chang L, Chen BB, Deater-Deckard K, Di Giunta L, Dodge KA, Malone PS, Oburu P, Pastorelli C, Skinner AT, Sorbring E, Steinberg L, Tapanya S, Alampay LP, Uribe Tirado LM, Zelli A. 2018. Longitudinal associations between parenting and youth adjustment in twelve cultural groups: Cultural normativeness of parenting as a moderator. Dev Psychol. 54(2):362-377.

Leung PWL and Kwon KSF. 1998. Parenting Styles, Motivational Orientations, and Self-Perceived Academic Competence: A Mediational Model. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly.44(1): 1-19.

Li N and Hein S. 2019. Parenting, Autonomy in Learning, and Development During Adolescence in China.  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. (163):67-80.

Lipps G, Lowe GA, Gibson RC, Halliday S, Morris A, Clarke N, Wilson RN. 2012. Parenting and depressive symptoms among adolescents in four Caribbean societies. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 6(1):31.

Long EC, Aggen SH, Gardner C, Kendler KS. 2015. Differential parenting and risk for psychopathology: a monozygotic twin difference approach. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 50(10):1569-76.

Lorence B, Hidalgo V, Pérez-Padilla J, Menéndez S. 2019. The Role of Parenting Styles on Behavior Problem Profiles of Adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 16(15):2767.

Luk JW, Patock-Peckham JA, Medina M, Terrell N, Belton D, King KM. 2016. Bullying perpetration and victimization as externalizing and internalizing pathways: A retrospective study linking parenting styles and self-esteem to depression, alcohol use, and alcohol-related problems Subst Use Misuse. 51(1): 113–125.

Martinez I, Garcia F, Veiga F, Garcia OF, Rodrigues Y, Serra E. 2020. Parenting Styles, Internalization of Values and Self-Esteem: A Cross-Cultural Study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(7):2370.

Martínez I, García JF, Yubero S. 2007. Parenting styles and adolescents’ self-esteem in Brazil. Psychol Rep. 2007 Jun;100(3 Pt 1):731-45.

Mills CM, Danovitch JH, Mugambi VN, Sands KR, Monroe AJ. 2022. Cognitive reflection and authoritarianism relate to how parents respond to children’s science questions. Dev Psychol. 58(3):417-424.

Muhtadie L, Zhou Q, Eisenberg N, Wang Y. 2013. Predicting internalizing problems in Chinese children: the unique and interactive effects of parenting and child temperament. Dev Psychopathol. 25(3):653-67.

Pinquart M. 2017. Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis. Dev Psychol. 53(5):873-932.

Pinquart M, Kauser R. 2018. Do the associations of parenting styles with behavior problems and academic achievement vary by culture? Results from a meta-analysis. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 24(1):75-100.

Piotrowski JT, Lapierre MA, Linebarger DL.2013. Investigating Correlates of Self-Regulation in Early Childhood with a Representative Sample of English-Speaking American Families. J Child Fam Stud. 22(3):423-436

Pong , Johnsten J, Chen V. 2010. Authoritarian Parenting and Asian Adolescent School Performance: Insights from the US and Taiwa. International Journal of Behavioral Development 34(1): 62-72.

Queiroz P, Garcia OF, Garcia F, Zacares JJ, Camino C. 2020. Self and Nature: Parental Socialization, Self-Esteem, and Environmental Values in Spanish Adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(10):3732

Querido JG, Warner TD, and Eyberg SM. 2002. Parenting Styles and Child Behavior in African American Families of Preschool Children Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 31(2): 272 – 277.

Radziszewska B, Richardson JL, Dent CW, Flay BR. 1996. Parenting style and adolescent depressive symptoms, smoking, and academic achievement: ethnic, gender, and SES differences. J Behav Med. 19(3):289-305.

Rothrauff TC, Cooney TM, and An JS. 2009. Remembered parenting styles and adjustment in middle and late adulthood. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 64(1):137-46.

Schmittmann VD, Visser I, and Raijmakers MEJ. 2006. Multiple learning modes in the development of performance on a rule-based category learning task. Neuropsychologia 44:2079–2091.

Steinberg L, Dornbusch SM, and Brown BB. 1992. Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement. An ecological perspective. Am Psychol. 47(6):723-9.

Steinberg L, Lamborn SD, Dornbusch SM, and Darling N. 1992. Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Dev. 63(5):1266-81.

Steinberg L, Elmen JD, and Mounts NS. 1989. Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Dev. 60(6):1424-36.

Steinberg L, Elman JD, and Mounts MS. 1989. Authoritative parenting, psychosocial maturity, and academic success among adolescents. Child Development 60: 1424-1436.

Teuber Z, Tang X, Sielemann L, Otterpohl N, Wild E. 2021. Autonomy-related Parenting Profiles and their Effects on Adolescents’ Academic and Psychological Development: A Longitudinal Person-oriented Analysis.  J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Nov 22. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01538-5.

Trinkner R, Cohn ES, Rebellon CJ, and Van Gundy K. 2012. Don’t trust anyone over 30: parental legitimacy as a mediator between parenting style and changes in delinquent behavior over time. J Adolesc. 35(1):119-32.

Underwood MK, Beron KJ, Rosen LH. 2009. Continuity and change in social and physical aggression from middle childhood through early adolescence. Aggress Behav. 35(5):357-75.

Waller R, Hyde LW, Klump KL, Burt SA. 2018. Parenting Is an Environmental Predictor of Callous-Unemotional Traits and Aggression: A Monozygotic Twin Differences Study.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 57(12):955-963.

Wang L, Chen X, Chen H, Cui L, and Li M. 2006. Affect and maternal parenting as predictors of adaptive and maladaptive behaviors in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 30:158–166.

Wolfradt U, Hempel S, and Miles JNV. 2003. Perceived parenting styles, depersonalisation, anxiety and coping behaviour in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 34(3): 521-532 .

Xu X, Dai DY, Liu M, Deng C. 2020. Parental psychological control and academic functioning in Chinese high school students: A short-term longitudinal study. Br J Dev Psychol. 38(1):90-107.

Yin P, Hou X, Qin Q, Deng W, Hu H, Luo Q, Du L, Qiu H, Qiu T, Fu Y, Meng H, Li T. 2016. Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Mental Health of Children: A Twin Study. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 54(8):29-34.

Zhou Q, Eisenberg N, Wang Y, and Reiser M. 2004. Chinese children’s effortful control and dispositional anger/frustration: relations to parenting styles and children’s social functioning. Dev Psychol. 40(3):352-66.

Zurcher JD, Holmgren HG, Coyne SM, Barlett CP, Yang C. 2018. Parenting and Cyberbullying Across Adolescence.Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 21(5):294-303.

Image of shadowy confrontation with child by istock / AlexLinch

image of kids in classroom cropped from photo by monkeybusinessimages / shutterstock

Portions of the text derive from earlier versions of this article, written by the same author

Content last modified 5/2022


Source link